A lack of science?

The recent survey by @ingeniousbrit showed a mixed response from small businesses on independence. There was a small majority (48%) who thought a Yes vote would harm their business but a significant minority (37%) thought it would be a positive step.  They surveyed 1000 businesses but there was little detail about their size or nature. Despite this lack of scientific method, the survey was picked up by the BBC and other media.

 

The Economy committee’s Inquiry into Scotland’s Economic Future Post-2014 restarts this week by taking evidence from business representative bodies.  However, judging by their written submissions, the scientific and technology companies will not be uppermost in the evidence session. Of the three written submissions only the CBI even mention science or spin-outs and then only in the context of university research funding.  It seems in responding to the inquiry these organisations have failed to look at the future for the economy in Scotland and particularly the new growth areas in technology and science.

In the second panel is the Reid Foundation whose paper at least looks to develop a vision for a future economy. It states

“Given Scotland's levels of education, history of innovation, natural resources and geostrategic position we should be a high-skill, high-pay, high-productivity, high-investment, high-innovation economy.”

They go on to list areas including innovation where Scotland can develop this vision. Interestingly, one thing they suggest is that education and training should be more about engineering, maths, computing and design.  But not science, then go on to champion scientific research and development in another point:

“We should seek 'smart specialisation' wherever we can developing specialisations where Scotland's high-skill workforce and research and development make us competitive in export markets.”

Their evidence may be contradictory in places but at least it addresses the actual issue of the type of economy Scotland should develop rather than the esoteric and unanswerable questions that have so far dominated the debate.

Last week it was the turn of the Education Committee to start taking evidence on the future of Scotland with representatives from Universities.   They did address the issue of research and innovation but again failed to develop a future view, simply hoping the status quo would prevail after the referendum.

At the Scottish Labour party conference in Perth, the mood was upbeat with claims of the biggest conference turnout.  However, there was little for @Posvespin to tweet although research and innovation got a passing mention in the leader’s speech. Next it is the turn of the SNP with a rally for the referendum in Aberdeen from 11 April.

Dr Tony Axon is Director of Positive Spin and can get your views on Science and technology and other policies to the decision makers and politicians.